
How to Find a Private Carer in the UK: A Practical Guide
Mark Acheson | Editorial Contributor
8-minute read | 29/04/2026


My mum had left the gas on again. Her neighbour had smelled it from the hallway and let herself in with the spare key. Mum was sitting in her armchair watching Countdown, completely unaware.
I drove the two hours to her house that afternoon with my stomach in knots. And sitting across from her at her kitchen table — in the house she'd lived in for 41 years, surrounded by her garden, her photos, her cat — I said the words I'd been dreading for months.
"Mum, I think it might be time to look at a care home."
She didn't argue. She just looked out the window at her roses. And that look on her face — that quiet, dignified sadness — has stayed with me ever since.
I think most of us grow up believing that when a parent can no longer manage alone, there are really only two options: move them in with you or find a care home.
I genuinely wanted to move her in with us. But I work full-time. My husband works full-time. We have two kids. And my mum's needs — the memory lapses, the falls risk, the medication management — were beyond what we could safely provide, even with the best will in the world.
So I did what any overwhelmed adult child does. I started researching care homes.
I spent three weekends visiting facilities within a 30-mile radius of her house. Some were fine. Clean. Organised. The staff were kind. But every single one had a TV lounge where a dozen residents sat in chairs around the perimeter of the room, largely in silence. Every single one smelled faintly of industrial cleaning products and overcooked vegetables.
And every single one was not my mum's home.
Here's what nobody tells you when you start down the care home path: the move itself can be medically harmful for people with dementia.
A 2023 review published in The Lancet noted that relocation stress — sometimes called "transfer trauma" — is a well-documented phenomenon in elderly populations. For people with cognitive decline in particular, being removed from a familiar environment can accelerate confusion, increase anxiety, and in some cases, lead to a measurable decline in physical health.
My mum's GP, when I mentioned this to her, nodded without even blinking. "We see it more than people realise," she told me. "The familiarity of home — the smells, the sounds, the layout they know instinctively — provides a form of orientation that you simply cannot replicate in a new place."
The research backs her up. A study from the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society found that elderly people receiving care at home reported significantly higher levels of emotional wellbeing and autonomy than those in residential settings — even when their clinical needs were equivalent.
I had been approaching this as a logistical problem. What I was actually dealing with was a wellbeing problem. And the solution I had assumed was the only one available was, in many cases, the worse one.
That realisation stopped me in my tracks.
It was my friend Tess who first mentioned live-in care.
I'll be honest — my immediate reaction was dismissive. I assumed it was something for very wealthy families. I imagined it was complicated to arrange, hard to manage, and that finding someone you could actually trust to live in your parent's home would be nearly impossible.
Tess told me to stop talking and just look into it.
So I did. And what I found completely reframed how I thought about care.
Live-in care means exactly what it sounds like: a professional carer comes to live with your parent in their own home, providing one-to-one support around the clock. Your parent keeps their bedroom, their routines, their garden, their cat. They eat what they like, when they like. They see their friends. They maintain the life they built — just with the support to keep living it safely.
The contrast with a care home, when I actually laid it out, was stark.
Once I had made my peace with the idea, the next challenge felt enormous: actually finding someone.
I am a naturally cautious person. The idea of inviting a stranger to live in my mother's home, to have access to her medication, her finances, her daily life — that felt like a colossal leap of trust.
Which is why the service I ended up using made such a difference.
After some research, I came across a live-in care matching service that approached the whole thing very differently from the agency model I had expected. Instead of sending me a CV and wishing me luck, their care advisors took the time to understand my mum as a person — not just her care needs, but her personality, her hobbies (she's a lifelong gardener and a fierce crossword enthusiast), her sense of humour, what would make her feel comfortable in her own home.
They matched us with carers based on that whole picture. And before any placement began, they organised a video call so my mum and I could meet the carer, ask questions, and get a genuine feel for whether the personalities would click.
That video call was the moment my anxiety started to ease. The carer they suggested — I'll call her R — had worked with dementia patients for years, had a similarly dry sense of humour to my mum, and as a gardener herself, spent the first ten minutes of the call asking about the roses.
My mum was laughing within fifteen minutes.
Care started within four days of that first call. And on the practical side — billing, organising carer breaks, any adjustments — the support team handled everything. It was less administration than I had feared and far more human than I had expected.
The one thing I'll say that isn't purely glowing: the first week was an adjustment. For my mum, for R, for all of us. There was a period of settling in that required patience. But the support team had warned me about exactly that, and they checked in proactively. By week two, my mum was telling me on the phone that R had made her laugh so hard she'd spilled her tea.
It has been four months.
My mum is still in her house. She had her birthday in her own sitting room, with her own friends around her table. She still does her crossword every morning. She and R have planted new sweet peas together along the back fence.
Her consultant noted at her last review that her mood was markedly improved. Her sleep is more consistent. The small but frightening incidents — the gas, the falls — have not recurred.
I sleep better too.
I am not saying live-in care is the right answer for every family. Care needs are complex, and there are situations where residential care is genuinely the better clinical choice. But I spent months assuming I had no alternative — and I wish somebody had sat me down much earlier and shown me what I showed myself in that comparison table.
If your parent is approaching a stage where they need more support, and you're beginning to feel the weight of that conversation, I'd encourage you to at least explore this before you do anything else.
The service I used covers every postcode in Great Britain and can have care in place within 24 hours for urgent situations.
If you want to understand whether live-in care is the right fit for your parent — and what it would actually look like for your specific situation — the best first step is a conversation with one of their care advisors. There's no pressure and no commitment. It's just a conversation with someone who knows this landscape well and can help you think it through.
I wish I'd had that conversation six months earlier than I did.
This is the story of a customer who was kind enough to share it in her own words.

Mark Acheson | Editorial Contributor

Mark Acheson | Editorial Contributor

Mark Acheson | Editorial Contributor

Zenya Smith | Editorial Contributor

Zenya Smith | Editorial Contributor

Zenya Smith | Editorial Contributor